research on genetic engineering

A. Lorch, Third World Resurgence No. 242/243, Nov. 2010

It was clear from the beginning of the biennial United Nations biodiversity conference in Nagoya that money was - and is - a crucial issue. Unfortunately, the conference confirmed a consistent pattern of failure to make sufficient provision for developing countries to enable them to implement their commitments under the CBD.

blog

7 November 2011

Monday's side event at the SBSTTA meeting of the CBD by the pet industry gave an impressive insight how to deal with pets and ornamental plants becoming invasive: Simply tell consumers not to release them.
Or even better: put up posters in shops and print a line on the bag in which you buy your fish or pond plants and all will be solved.
Don't bother involving academics or even the governments - retailers are the best people to talk to consumers, and they are already used to put up posters and hand out flyers.
Don't confuse anybody with science. Because in the end the real problem of pets and ornamental plants becoming invasive alien species are the uneducated pet-owners and individual gardeners

While three representatives of the pet industry in the US, Canada and Europe were happily showing off their colourful flyers for nearly an hour, they did not give any numbers or any statistic data that would support their claims that this approach is or would be an effective strategy.
The only figures they gave were about the amount of tax revenue produced by the pet industry, and the great coincidence the tax revenue generated in Europe in the last years (of about 12 billion) is the same amount as the damage caused by invasive species. So that would even each other out - Problem solved.

Repeatedly they stated that when it comes to invasive species, the pet industry is not part of the problem, but part of the solution.
But then again, when you spend so much time and effort to re-define the problem to blame the consumers who don't know what to do with unwanted aquarium fish, then you can forget about all the other ways in which pets and plants can escape and continue making money in the pet industry.

2 July 2011

Behind us is infinite power.
Before us is endless possibility.
Around us is boundless opportunity.
Why should we fear?

Unfortunately that is not the closing statement of the Meeting of the Aarhus Convention. It's an advertisement poster of Chisinau Airport, showing seven children in the departure lounge, ready to travel the world - Except that they probably aren't.

30 June 2011

"The de facto exclusion of GMOs from the Aarhus Convention was not due to scientific certainty or lack of public interest but was due to a very unfortunate constellation of lack of political will at a certain historical moment."

reports & articles

H. Paul & A. Lorch, ECO, Vol. 36(1)

Discussions on funding, financial targets and innovative financial mechanisms were extremely difficult during the COP10 in Nagoya in October 2010 and clearly revealed the divide between North and South. They also reflect a wider struggle going on over the effectiveness and implications of market‐oriented approaches to the three Rio Conventions, including biodiversity conservation. This struggle that is going to be central for "Rio+20", the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development where 'green economy' is one of the two main topics on the agenda.

Helena Paul, Almuth Ernsting, Stella Semino, Susanne Gura & Antje Lorch (EcoNexus, Biofuelwatch, Grupo de Reflexion Rural, NOAH - Friends of the Earth Denmark), and The Development Fund Norway.
Report published for COP15, of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen, December 2009.

Few would deny that agriculture is especially severely affected by climate change and that the right practices contribute to mitigate it, yet expectations of the new climate agreement diverge sharply, as well as notions on what are good and what are bad agricultural practices and whether soil carbon sequestration should be part of carbon trading.

Ch. Then& A. Lorch, study for the BÖLW, March 2009.

Using agro-biotechnology causes high costs for the whole food production chain: through higher seed prices, methods to avoid resistance development, separation production chains and analyses. In additions there are damages of several billion US dollars in maize and rice production caused by contamination with non-approved gene constructs. Small as they are, financial gains of GM crops can only achieved over short periods.
This study provides information from a survey among German food producers and retailers as well as details of costs and damages caused by a number of contamination cases.